To Read or Not to Read
In the previous post, I claimed that reading your paper at a conference is not necessarily bad. Not everyone thinks this. There is a large and vocal contingent of scholars for whom reading your paper is the worst kind of conference sin. This is typically because, as I stated above, a lot of read papers tend to be badly read.
So when is reading your paper okay? Or, rather, what makes a good reading? Part of it, as I also said before, has to do with how the paper is written: is it conversational? Does it clearly communicate one idea or topic? Can an audience follow that argument easily? These are the prerequisites for reading a paper aloud at a conference. If you’re presenting snippets from an essay, for the love of all that’s holy do NOT read it at your panel.